| On the Syntax of Diagrams * |
![]() |
I find it useful to defer making the syntactic distinction between
text and graphics for as long as possible. So I ambiguously refer
to a discernible visual chunk like a diagram as a
"text graphic object", which may in turn recursively be a pattern
of other text graphic objects. At the bottom finally are visual
"drawlines".


Details and Examples
Text graphic object notation: how the spider webs work, various
relations of spatial structure to tree structure.
And, no, text graphic object notation is not the syntax for diagrams,
but rather a notation for describing various possible syntaxes ...
at the bottom is an operational definition of structure in text graphic images.
Romanji text: example syntax showing how Roman style text
can be defined as 26 little patterns with certain conventions
for arranging them spatially.
Diagrams, visual languages, and spatial parsing: some definitions.
Binary Trees: example syntax; and machine readable, visually
notated context free grammar used by a spatial parser to
recover underlying syntactic structure.
Bar charts: example syntax; visual grammar.
Blackboard Image with embedded diagrams: example syntax
only (grammar and parsing part of on going work ...)
Textual BNF: character only syntax for text graphic objects
and Romanji text
* Originally written for Alan Blackwell's THINKING WITH DIAGRAMS '97 WORKSHOP, Portsmouth, England, January 9-10, 1997; subsequently modified after reading Yuri Engelhardt's thesis July 25, 2002. A one Web page summary of this article appeared at Alan's site, and a paper version was printed in the proceedings.
© 1996, 2002 PGC